I get that the guys in this pod have seen the series in its entirety but it really makes episodic podcasts a problem when they’re commenting on each one as part of the whole. Also - why no episode 5 review??

The speakers are plain annoying to listen to. One constantly interjects and interrupts, and the other constantly stutters and second guesses all of his thoughts. Both speakers put minimal work into forming their thoughts before opening their wide mouths. Long story short: This podcast has no redeeming factors.

Just some honest criticism, but one of the presenters always interrupts the other as if he doesn’t listen, doesn’t care what the other person has to say, thinks he is the final word on every topic, and is too busy trying to be heard. It is really distracting, and quite frankly, you can tell that the other presenter doesn’t like it. There were noticeable sighs by the offended presenter in both episodes that I’ve heard. It seems like you seriously don’t like each other. It’s that lack of chemistry that is turning me off from the show - enough so that I actually wrote this. Updated Edit: just listened to the 3rd episode and I thought it fair to update my prior criticism by increasing the rating to a 4 star. Third episode was much more cohesive and there was synergy this time around that was lacking in the two prior episodes. Good job reviewing the 3rd Episode and providing your individual takes on it. I like that one of the presenters has played the game and the other person has not. This gives a better, more informed, review from both perspectives. Thanks and well done.