While in general, this podcast attempts to present news from both sides, the reporters and moderators can’t help but interject their own personal left-slanted bias. This podcast, and journalism in general, would be much better served by the removal of opinion and focus on factual statements.

My favorite news podcast! I dont pay for ad free, so the one drawback is that the person who does the ad reads has the most grating voice… I dont know how else to explain other than her voice is the worst. But love Luke (I only listen in the morning but im sure Annie is great too) and the guests are always on point!

I love the WSJ and was happy to find the podcast, which is always interesting/informative. Lately tho, two things are bugging me - first, the woman doing the voiceovers for the ads (amazon lately) has absolutely the most grating voice. It makes me cringe — esp when I can’t hit fast forward! There are SO many good voices out there, please give that job to someone else! Second, it feels like the q & a b/w the host and the reporter is getting further dumbed down. They repeat the main points of the story too many times, and leave lots of obvious questions unaddressed. Come on WSJ, we’ve got more discerning ears and better brains than you think! That being said, thanks for providing this podcast gratis, it is appreciated!

I’ve been listening to this podcast for years. It’s the one news source I’ve been able to find that is consistently balanced, offers both sides of the story and has a mix of economic new (which is what I’m into) and regular news. Highly recommend!

Briefly addresses current issues

Love this podcast. Perfect dose of news in the AM and PM. Just enough to stay current and updated, short and precise, and top notch reporters.

I listen to the morning and pm podcast of this show. Great review of todays happening and more in-depth with business side that other podcast skip. Then 2nd part of show with in-depth topic is also very interesting.

This is where I get all my best biz news in the mornings Don’t listen to the afternoon version often (try to go news free after work) but when I have listened I appreciate slight differences in delivery. No nonsense, impartial and well paced

Very straightforward, provides information and context without spin.

Sorry I have to give WSJ a big flat F for the Musk Affair story! Turns out to be false.

Just heard a tidbit about Dr Fauci retiring, it sounded like he was some sort of expert on COVID and was a great leader during the crisis. Clown show. 🤡

More than one reporter repeats the phrase, “Ya know.” If I know, why are you telling me? Quit using empty colloquialisms to fill in spaces where you were thinking about what you should have thought about before you opened your mouth.

I listen because it provides a small bit of news on my way to work. But it’s mainly a training ground for entry level newsreaders who sound like college or high school kids.

No mention of Biden’s administration disastrous policies on the border immigration and towards the oil industry. Better than most other left-wing propaganda outlets, but still biased and incomplete reporting and analysis of reality.

I’ve listened to this podcast for over two years, especially once Audible ended its WSJ daily news. I used to notice more professionalism and very rarely any bias. Unfortunately, the trend towards more opinionated questioning and cherry-picked guests has tarnished the independent and professional view I had regarding the WSJ’s non editorial section. I hope this trend does not continue, but I’m not optimistic, especially since some larger stories seem to only be covered in the editorial section while remain uncovered even weeks later in other sections.

You just lost me - but happy I have you a try.

No mention that the US removing millions of barrels a day hurt oil supply. Why aren’t we restarting production efforts?

One of the few media podcast that report the news versus a bias editorial. Thanks WSJ

Best podcast I have yet to find for daily news, and 2x a day woo hoo!

This podcast lies through omission, favoring left-wing talking points. I prefer a balanced perspective.

Generally an okay podcast. The “interviews” with WSJ journalists are often tedious. They explain things as if the audience is in middle school. Many of the journalists should not do audio interviews. I wonder if they are trying to be like the Daily from NYT? It’s the WSJ!

Finally a news-based podcast that does away with hysterics and focuses on facts and meaningful discussion.

This is a genuine professional news organization. Straight reporting. No advocacy (which is pretty much all you get from the news sources I used to rely on like NYT and NPR). Thank goodness there is still one place to turn for real information.

After listening to this show, I feel informed, up to date, and conversant on the topics that matter. Highly recommend!

Am I the only one in the 30 and under category that heard this episode & thought it was hugely tone deaf? I’m 25 years old and absolutely discuss salary with all of my friends, as well as my parents. Has the host ever used Glassdoor? FishBowl? It felt very outdated, and as if the host has never asked someone about their pay that is younger than 30. The interviewer’s line of questions also seemed bizarre (with shocked reactions at the notion of posting salary information public), and was cracking me up. I hope WSJ can get a better grasp on the what the labor economy looks like soon.

This is a quick 15 minute summary of the news with a short deeper dive into a big story.

Great podcast for important daily news

Informative and without noticeable spin

Review gives thoughtful perspectives on this war’s complex background, current plight and thoughts about bigger picture matters.

Listened to this podcast for years, but can’t anymore after they forced a political stance on the Canadian trucks. I disappointed in myself for thinking they were different then CNN and MSNBC.

The WSJ use to be know for it’s integrity. This show has little if any integrity. It presents only stories or facts that support one side of the political spectrum. It feels like wsj is pushing an agenda that aligns with CNN or MSNBC instead of presenting the news of the day.

A lot of inaccurate stories.

Definitely an under-rated news pod. Fair, and generally without noticeable political bias.

January 20, 2022 edition with Eliza Collins shows that the Wall Street Journal needs a whole lot of work when it comes to facts. She said the Republicans “feel” that the states should be in charge of how they vote. Uh… they don’t feel that way, the Constitution explicitly states that. Please educate your young reporters to report correctly and not how they feel about things. I am a paying subscription holder and hate to think that I’m wasting my money. Do better, please.

This podcast is part of my daily routine. Love the news stories each morning and evening and the thoughtful reporting on big headlines. Keep up the great work!

Bringing latest news in a nice way. Host Annmarie is a great host of the show

You are a joke when it comes to good information playing down a virus that has killed 1 million people should be seen as a trader too you’re country .

This podcast does an amazing job at keeping you informed about what is going on in the world and is as close to objective as I have found. They may have a business friendly leaning but that is it. If you are interested in business, markets and money, this is an amazing show for you, enjoy!

Wow, shocker of an “interview” with a CCP operative who is embedded in the London School of Economics. Who knew the Communist Party is all-in for transparency, equity and economic fairness for the average citizen?? The real laugher is when she claimed, unchallenged, that Chinese citizens all trust the Government with their personal information - more than any private company. Who needs troll farms when the WSJ facilitates and promotes government propaganda?

It’s a pretty snappy presentation of news highlights, but every now and then you have to endure an interview with a self-proclaimed expert trying to pass off a political point as high-brow academia (case: Fertoli’s interview with Harvard’s Claudia Golden on 12/27/21). I stopped listening to NPR because of rubbish like this. Usually WSJ does a good job of avoiding this useless information, so their gatekeeping could be better.

Geez. This news is not useful, helpful or needed. Btw. Where is the news on the Maxwell trial.

How come you seem to avoid reporting Biden’s legislative setbacks? Was the suspension of Biden’s effort to pass his social programs bill this week not news? Was the CBO’s scoring of the bill this week not news? Was the parliamentarian’s ruling on the immigration portion of the bill not news? This is not the first time and in fact there is a well established pattern of simply not reporting Biden’s setbacks. Unlike the opinion division, The WSJ news division seems to have sold its soul and is trending woke and CNNish. Where is your journalistic self respect? Listen to Potomac Watch instead to get your news.

I absolutely love WSJ and the quick hit content of this podcast. That said, the repetitious Facebook ad every beginning, middle and end of the show is getting to be unbearable. I think I actually have the ad memorized by now because they play it so many times. I have never had a company pepper it’s audience with constant reminders that “they take down bad actors online” - it’s frankly sketchy that they feel the need to remind us so many times per day that they are doing the bare minimum on security. If I were FB, I would completely revamp this ad strategy. Less is more friends.

If only they had any ads other than the pro-facebook propaganda they got in circulation right now then this would be an awesome pod. Instead its just so so so bad

Have been a loyal listener for years, but have to remove app due to liberal viewpoints and brainwashing ads!!

Please drop the Facebook add or I will stop listening.

Every clear mind knows Facebook is bad news, we should never use it. Bye bye, low WSJ.

Like the podcast, but I’m dropping you.due to your advertisements for Facebook. Facebook is too insidious and despicable to support or tolerate. Goodbye.

Not sure if you pay for the WSJ why you would have to listen to commercials on a Podcast. Very annoying. In addition justvwas so proud to subscribe considering the reveal on Facebook aka Meta. Now we have to listen to adds again again and again stating that Facebook is doing a great job.

Generally enjoy this podcast but the bulk Facebook advertising claiming they are the biggest fighters of bad intentions online makes me want to vomit. I suppose this is the highest bidder for advertising and that’s all these guys care about but it’s pretty insufferable.