One of the few media podcast that report the news versus a bias editorial. Thanks WSJ

Best podcast I have yet to find for daily news, and 2x a day woo hoo!

This podcast lies through omission, favoring left-wing talking points. I prefer a balanced perspective.

Generally an okay podcast. The “interviews” with WSJ journalists are often tedious. They explain things as if the audience is in middle school. Many of the journalists should not do audio interviews. I wonder if they are trying to be like the Daily from NYT? It’s the WSJ!

Finally a news-based podcast that does away with hysterics and focuses on facts and meaningful discussion.

This is a genuine professional news organization. Straight reporting. No advocacy (which is pretty much all you get from the news sources I used to rely on like NYT and NPR). Thank goodness there is still one place to turn for real information.

After listening to this show, I feel informed, up to date, and conversant on the topics that matter. Highly recommend!

Am I the only one in the 30 and under category that heard this episode & thought it was hugely tone deaf? I’m 25 years old and absolutely discuss salary with all of my friends, as well as my parents. Has the host ever used Glassdoor? FishBowl? It felt very outdated, and as if the host has never asked someone about their pay that is younger than 30. The interviewer’s line of questions also seemed bizarre (with shocked reactions at the notion of posting salary information public), and was cracking me up. I hope WSJ can get a better grasp on the what the labor economy looks like soon.

This is a quick 15 minute summary of the news with a short deeper dive into a big story.

Great podcast for important daily news

Informative and without noticeable spin

Review gives thoughtful perspectives on this war’s complex background, current plight and thoughts about bigger picture matters.

Listened to this podcast for years, but can’t anymore after they forced a political stance on the Canadian trucks. I disappointed in myself for thinking they were different then CNN and MSNBC.

The WSJ use to be know for it’s integrity. This show has little if any integrity. It presents only stories or facts that support one side of the political spectrum. It feels like wsj is pushing an agenda that aligns with CNN or MSNBC instead of presenting the news of the day.

A lot of inaccurate stories.

Definitely an under-rated news pod. Fair, and generally without noticeable political bias.

January 20, 2022 edition with Eliza Collins shows that the Wall Street Journal needs a whole lot of work when it comes to facts. She said the Republicans “feel” that the states should be in charge of how they vote. Uh… they don’t feel that way, the Constitution explicitly states that. Please educate your young reporters to report correctly and not how they feel about things. I am a paying subscription holder and hate to think that I’m wasting my money. Do better, please.

This podcast is part of my daily routine. Love the news stories each morning and evening and the thoughtful reporting on big headlines. Keep up the great work!

Bringing latest news in a nice way. Host Annmarie is a great host of the show

You are a joke when it comes to good information playing down a virus that has killed 1 million people should be seen as a trader too you’re country .

This podcast does an amazing job at keeping you informed about what is going on in the world and is as close to objective as I have found. They may have a business friendly leaning but that is it. If you are interested in business, markets and money, this is an amazing show for you, enjoy!

Wow, shocker of an “interview” with a CCP operative who is embedded in the London School of Economics. Who knew the Communist Party is all-in for transparency, equity and economic fairness for the average citizen?? The real laugher is when she claimed, unchallenged, that Chinese citizens all trust the Government with their personal information - more than any private company. Who needs troll farms when the WSJ facilitates and promotes government propaganda?

It’s a pretty snappy presentation of news highlights, but every now and then you have to endure an interview with a self-proclaimed expert trying to pass off a political point as high-brow academia (case: Fertoli’s interview with Harvard’s Claudia Golden on 12/27/21). I stopped listening to NPR because of rubbish like this. Usually WSJ does a good job of avoiding this useless information, so their gatekeeping could be better.

Geez. This news is not useful, helpful or needed. Btw. Where is the news on the Maxwell trial.

How come you seem to avoid reporting Biden’s legislative setbacks? Was the suspension of Biden’s effort to pass his social programs bill this week not news? Was the CBO’s scoring of the bill this week not news? Was the parliamentarian’s ruling on the immigration portion of the bill not news? This is not the first time and in fact there is a well established pattern of simply not reporting Biden’s setbacks. Unlike the opinion division, The WSJ news division seems to have sold its soul and is trending woke and CNNish. Where is your journalistic self respect? Listen to Potomac Watch instead to get your news.

I absolutely love WSJ and the quick hit content of this podcast. That said, the repetitious Facebook ad every beginning, middle and end of the show is getting to be unbearable. I think I actually have the ad memorized by now because they play it so many times. I have never had a company pepper it’s audience with constant reminders that “they take down bad actors online” - it’s frankly sketchy that they feel the need to remind us so many times per day that they are doing the bare minimum on security. If I were FB, I would completely revamp this ad strategy. Less is more friends.

If only they had any ads other than the pro-facebook propaganda they got in circulation right now then this would be an awesome pod. Instead its just so so so bad

Have been a loyal listener for years, but have to remove app due to liberal viewpoints and brainwashing ads!!

Please drop the Facebook add or I will stop listening.

Every clear mind knows Facebook is bad news, we should never use it. Bye bye, low WSJ.

Like the podcast, but I’m dropping you.due to your advertisements for Facebook. Facebook is too insidious and despicable to support or tolerate. Goodbye.

Not sure if you pay for the WSJ why you would have to listen to commercials on a Podcast. Very annoying. In addition justvwas so proud to subscribe considering the reveal on Facebook aka Meta. Now we have to listen to adds again again and again stating that Facebook is doing a great job.

Generally enjoy this podcast but the bulk Facebook advertising claiming they are the biggest fighters of bad intentions online makes me want to vomit. I suppose this is the highest bidder for advertising and that’s all these guys care about but it’s pretty insufferable.

Strange that you lead with Facebook ads while your leading reports state how Facebook is not protecting youths and others on what they allow to be posted. The ads diminish your reporting accuracy.

Does the Wall Street Journal require everyone they interview to answer each question starting with the word “so”?

Publishing Trump letter that is all lies!!! You are inciting violence & promoting & activating future riots. SHMAME ON YOU!!

Weather was nice in FL last weekend for Columbus Day. What weather delays??

This is a good summary and discussion of the major news of the day. Excellent production quality, mostly, from the best news source going, IMO. A quibble is that some of the guest interviewees are hard to understand, as their enunciation is sloppy. I feel like political bias is largely absent—as appropriate for a news organization.

That they're reporting all this negative news about Facebook and yet they play ads by Facebook

I appreciate the news coverage, but the pace of this podcast goes too quick for my taste. The reporters are jumping to the next topic before I can absorb what was just said.

I value the WSJ. However, these WSJ podcasts could be so much better. They seem to be trying to appeal to a younger demographic and so, as is usually the case in these unskilled attempts, they dumb it down and use goofy 20 something talk when they discuss issues. The lack of background and the knowledge gap in the reporting is breathtaking. They don’t know what they don’t know.

I like the tone of this newscast. No drama, just information with a business focus. Thanks WSJ!!

This is such a great podcast. You get some quality information in a short amount of time which is key. It’s the Wall Street Journal what else can I say? This goes without saying – A really nice job

I think these might be new but they’re driving me away. Hope we can omit those for the great core product of brief, broad news updates. Thx

My favorite news podcast. A great morning no update.

The core news stories (about the first three or four minutes) are a great summary of what is happening. However, when the go to their reporters in the field, sometimes their politically leanings shine through which disappoints.

Slick production and cute stories.

I’ve been a listener for a while, and I’ve stuck around and truly appreciate this podcast as one of my news sources thanks to their selection of the top news and how fairly (and objectively) they deliver the content.

Annemarie Fertoli has the voice of an angel. This podcast gets to the point.

This podcast has excellent coverage and professional hosts. Unfortunately they have segments from regular contributors who clearly are not broadcast journalists. They generally use voice inflections that are very unprofessional and would be eliminated with training. Sometimes called uptalk or upspeak. Either train these folks or hire a professional to read the copy. Sounds like amateur hour.